In this position paper, the Living Rivers Europe coalition shares some initial suggestions for the EU Water Initiative and what tools the existing policy framework offers to combat climate extremes & what EU action is still needed.
Positions & Resolutions
EAA’s Positions & Resolutions turn the collective voice of recreational anglers into action at European level. Adopted by EAA’s members, they set clear priorities and guide EAA’s advocacy on the issues that matter most for fish, waters, and the future of recreational angling in Europe.
Developed with input from members, expert subgroups, and partners, these positions form the foundation of EAA’s advocacy and its engagement with policy makers, advisory bodies, and other stakeholders.
The overview below is organised chronologically and shows how EAA’s priorities and policy work have evolved over time.
Act now:
THE FUTURE OF ANGLING
STARTS TODAY
THE FUTURE OF ANGLING
STARTS TODAY
Positions & Resolutions 2026
The European Anglers Alliance suggests the following regulations and actions concerning Seabass fishing opportunities for 2027.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- The EAA proposes a total catch that would stabilize SSB, ie 3431 tonnes in 2027. Bigger stocks and a more natural stock structure with more big fish serve anglers interests
- Angling, together with small scale fisheries, has by far the largest socio-economic benefit to society while having a small environmental footprint. The EAA calls for this to be recognised and acknowledged when deciding on fishing opportunities for 2027.
- The EAA calls on the Commission to take note of the December 2025 Ifremer study that estimates that SSB will fall below Blim by 2031 if MSY policy continues. Future stock crashes that may be induced by this policy must be avoided with a timely adjustment to the seabass fishing opportunities policy.
- EAA opposes new gear types to enter the seabass fishery.
- The EAA opposes any further bycatch relaxations because contrary to claims to that effect, they have not lowered discards over the past years.
- EAA furthermore calls management to take the ‘unavoidable’ part of the legislation more seriously and implement alternative discard reduction strategies (more on that in our full paper).
- To avoid the targeting of vulnerable species such as sharks or other non-quota species to maximize seabass bycatch volumes, the EAA proposes to switch bycatch allowances to a landings value based percentage to avoid such unintended consequences.
- EAA calls upon the Commission to be pro-active and make sure management areas cover the fish wherever they go, anticipating the increasing effects of climate change on stock distribution.
The European Anglers Alliance (EAA) has co-signed, together with 22 other organisations/associations, an open letter addressed to the European Commission on the need to preserve water resilience and prevent the weakening of the Water Framework Directive (WFD).
In the letter, the co-signing organisations underline that the focus should be on accelerating the Water Framework Directive’s implementation and enforcement – as was indicated in the EU Commission’s Water Resilience Strategy.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- Refrain from reopening, amending or weakening the WFD
- Prioritise the full and timely implementation and enforcement of the existing water acquis (including the provisional deal to update priority substances in surface water and groundwater) and the Water Resilience Strategy, including through pursuing the Structured Dialogues started at the end of 2025 with Member States,
- Ensure a clear, stable and predictable regulatory environment that safeguards progress, qualified workers and investment.
In this position paper, the Living Rivers Europe coalition warns against the revision of the Water Framework Directive, which was announced in the EU Commission’s ResourceEU Action Plan (December 2025). This revision will – according to LRE – imply “the lowering of water protection standards to respond to concerns raised in particular by the critical raw materials sector..(and) is casting a major risk of weakening of the water protection rules in Europe”.
The Living Rivers Europe coalition is composed of the European Anglers Alliance, the European Environmental Bureau, the European Rivers Network, Surfrider Foundation Europe, The Nature Conservancy, Wetlands International and WWF.
The full position paper can be downloaded below.
The document shares four key recommendations for the EU Commission and co-legislators.
- Refrain from revising or weakening the WFD
- Prioritise the full and timely implementation and enforcement of the existing water acquis (incl. the provisional deal to update priority substances in surface water & groundwater) and the Water Resilience Strategy, including through pursuing the Structured Dialogues started at the end of 2025 with Member States
- Give Member States time to implement the upcoming new guidance document on environmental permitting in relation to mining and water, and assess only later if more flexibility is needed
- Ensure a clear, stable and predictable regulatory environment that safeguards progress, qualified workers and investment.
The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) published its catch recommendations
for Atlantic salmon5 (Salmo salar) in the Baltic Sea (SD´s 22-31) for the year 2027 on the 29th of May
2026. The advice was originally published in May 2025, and ICES has evaluated this advice and
confirms that it conforms to the ICES standard of providing advice based on the best available science
to decision makers. ICES considers it suitable to inform management actions and it remains valid for
2027.
The European Anglers Alliance suggests the following regulations and actions concerning Baltic salmon for 2026:
The full position paper can be downloaded below.
- It is essential to maintain recreational angling opportunities for Atlantic Salmon in the Baltic Sea.
- Recreational trolling north of 59.30 N should be subject to member state regulation and not be unnecessarily regulated by a 4 nautical mile boundary.
- Take into account that ICES acknowledges that most of the catch-and-release (C&R) salmon in recreational trolling survive when discarded.
- Regulations demanding landing of whole un-filleted fish should only be for salmonids (salmon and sea trout), not for other species such as pike, perch and pikeperch.
- Utilise more EMFAF funding for the removal of fish migration barriers in the rivers.
- An ecosystem-based and adaptive management plan for salmon must be adopted.
- Adoption of the Framework towards development of a European Management Plan for the Great Cormorant1 to reduce the impact of cormorant predation on salmon stocks
The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) published its catch recommendations
for western Baltic cod6 (Gadus morhua) on 28 May 2025 for the years 2026 and the identical advice
for 2027 on 4 February 2026. Current scientific information shows that the western Baltic cod stock
suffers from both environmental factors affecting reproductive success, a previous history of
overfishing and that selective commercial fishing gears that could reduce bycatch of small cod have
not yet been utilised.
Within the framework of the EU management plan, ICES has recommended zero catch for cod in
the western Baltic Sea for 2026 and 2027.
The European Anglers Alliance suggests the following regulations and actions concerning Baltic
cod for 2027:
The full position paper can be downloaded below.
- Recreational fishing opportunities for cod must be preserved.
- Consider a combination of management measures that ensures equivalent protection at simultaneous higher anglers’ satisfaction: introduce a maximum landing size for anglers, increase the minimum landing size and combine both with seasonal closures and bag limits; intensify the dialogue between the interest groups, science, and politics.
- No dedicated fishing activities on spawning cod.
- Improvement and obligatory use of selective gear to reduce bycatch of cod in commercial fisheries is urgently needed.
- Adoption of the Framework towards development of a European Management Plan for the Great Cormorant to reduce the impact of cormorant predation on cod stocks.
Positions & Resolutions 2025
The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) has issued restrictive catch advice for Baltic salmon in order to protect weak river-specific stocks, while recognising that carefully designed spatial and temporal management can allow limited fishing opportunities. This advice has triggered policy decisions that directly affect recreational salmon fisheries in the Baltic Sea.
The European Anglers Alliance (EAA) supports the protection and recovery of vulnerable salmon stocks but considers that current management measures affecting recreational anglers are not always proportionate, scientifically robust, or ecosystem-based. Recreational fishing is not the cause of weak salmon populations, yet it delivers high social, economic and conservation value, including strong angler engagement in river restoration and stock recovery.
EAA therefore calls for a more balanced, adaptive and ecosystem-based salmon management approach, grounded in up-to-date science, realistic assessments of recreational fishing impacts, and policies that maintain angler involvement as a key driver for long-term salmon conservation.
EAA suggests the following actions and regulations.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- A bag limit of one salmon (excluding recent spawners) per angler and day for sea anglers south of latitude 59.30 N.
- Recreational trolling north of 59.30 N should be subject to member state regulation and not be unnecessarilyt regulated by a 4 naturical mile boundary.
- Take into account that ICES acknowledges that most of the catch-and-release (C&R) salmon in recreational trolling survive when discarded.
- Regulations demanding landing of whole un-filleted fish should only be for salmonids (salmon and sea trout), not for other species such as pike, perch and pikeperch.
- Utilise more EMFAF funding for the removal of fish migration barriers in the rivers.
- An ecosystem-based and adaptive management plan for salmon must be adopted.
- Adoption of the Framework towards development of a European Management Plan for the Great Cormorant1 to reduce the impact of cormorant predation on salmon stocks.
The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) has advised zero catch for western Baltic cod under the EU management framework, reflecting the stock’s poor condition driven by environmental stress, reduced reproductive success and a legacy of overfishing. ICES also highlights that more selective commercial fishing gears capable of reducing cod bycatch are still not sufficiently applied.
The European Anglers Alliance (EAA) recognises the need for strong protection and recovery of Baltic cod, but stresses that recreational fishing and commercial fishing are fundamentally different activities. Recreational anglers do not fish for profit and are motivated by the experience, not by maximising catches. Well-designed recreational management measures can therefore deliver high stock protection while maintaining angler participation and socio-economic value for coastal communities.
EAA considers that recreational anglers have already made a substantial contribution to stock protection and should not be excluded from the fishery where equivalent conservation outcomes can be achieved through alternative, science-based management tools. EAA therefore calls for a balanced, ecosystem-based and adaptive approach to Baltic cod management that safeguards stock recovery while preserving recreational fishing opportunities and angler engagement.
The European Anglers Alliance suggests the following regulations and actions concerning Baltic cod for 2026.
The following positions summarise the European Anglers Alliance’s EAA Climate Change Position Paper (September 2021).
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- Recreational fishing opportunities for cod must be preserved
- Consider a combination of management measures that ensures equivalent protection at simultaneous higher anglers’ satisfaction: introduce a maximum landing size for anglers, increase the minimum landing size and combine both with seasonal closures and bag limits; intensify the dialogue between the interest groups, science, and politics.
- No dedicated fishing activities on spawning cod.
- Improvement and obligatory use of selective gear to reduce bycatch of cod in commercial fisheries is urgently needed.
- Adoption of the Framework towards development of a European Management Plan for the Great Cormorant2to reduce the impact of cormorant predation on cod stocks.
In response to the EU’s climate and energy objectives, the European Union and the United Kingdom have committed to a rapid and large-scale expansion of offshore renewable energy, notably offshore wind, under initiatives such as REPowerEU and the revised Renewable Energy Directive. These targets imply a dramatic increase in offshore wind capacity by 2030, requiring accelerated planning, permitting and construction across European seas.
The European Anglers Alliance (EAA) supports the transition towards renewable energy and recognises the importance of reducing dependence on fossil fuels. However, EAA stresses that this transition must not come at the expense of marine ecosystems, biodiversity and existing sea users, including recreational and small-scale fisheries. Poorly planned offshore wind development risks long-term ecological impacts, spatial conflicts and irreversible damage, particularly given the current data and knowledge gaps on cumulative effects on fish populations and marine habitats.
EAA therefore calls for a precautionary, ecosystem-based and spatially coherent approach to offshore renewable energy development, grounded in sound science, transparent governance and the application of the user pays and polluter pays principles. Offshore wind must deliver climate benefits while safeguarding marine biodiversity and fair access to public marine space.
The following key points summarise the EAA position on Offshore Renewable Energy (ORE).
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- Licenses to operate offshore wind turbines shall be for a limited time (25 years) and after that, require renegotiation with affected member states and stakeholder organisations.
- Win-win solutions shall be prioritised e.g. built in fish sheltering and nursery functionality to support fish recruitment and replenishment. Ecosystem conditions and services rendered to co-users should be taken into account when considering lease extensions or site remediation obligations.
- Windfarms should be accessible and open to recreational anglers (rod and line fishers) during production and after decommissioning, while adhering to the rules valid for navigating and conduct in offshore wind farms (example: Denmark).
- Funding is needed to restore damages, to invest in a plus for biodiversity according to the biodiversity net gain principle, to compensate disadvantaged (prior) users and specifically:
- Angler education programmes to support fishing in offshore wind farms.
- Environmental mitigation measures should be included in all projects to protect and improve the biotope and fish stocks, both in and outside of wind farms. Such measures should compensate for damage during the creation, operation and removal of offshore wind turbines.
- To the extent that negative impacts are known, these should be properly managed right from the project start.
- Together with other (public) funding, extensive scientific research in this area is required. This is underlined by the ’23 report of the European Court of auditors that highlights the risks of a large scale rollout while many risks are still uncertain at this point.
- To establish reliable ecological baseline data well before any construction activities start, extensive monitoring should begin as soon as an area has been designated for wind park construction.
- New insights on the effects of offshore wind may impact lease terms and in extreme cases, the lease period. Co-use management may likewise be influenced by ongoing insights.
The European Anglers Alliance (EAA) welcomes the improved scientific assessment of the European sea bass stock, while underlining that continued precaution and balanced management remain essential. Stock recovery has been achieved through strict and targeted measures, and future decisions must consolidate these gains, avoid premature catch increases, and ensure fair allocation between fishing sectors.
The EAA position for Sea bass opportunities for is as follows.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- Maintain closed seasons for both recreational and commercial fisheries.
- Do not apply MSY advice that would sharply increase catches and risk stock depletion.
- Refine recreational catch estimates, especially where data quality remains limited.
- Maintain the current catch structure, prioritising recreational fishing and hook-and-line fisheries.
- Increase the recreational bag limit in a measured way, reflecting stock recovery and socio-economic value.
- Keep bycatch limits tight to protect the stock and small-scale fisheries.
- Address the growth of high-capacity fleets and their potential impact on sea bass.
- Finalise the Sea Bass Catch Allocation Tool with clear timelines and milestones.
- Introduce real-time area closures to reduce harmful bycatch and discards.
Positions & Resolutions 2024
The European Anglers Alliance (EAA) recognises fish welfare as an essential element of responsible and sustainable angling. Recreational angling generates significant social and economic value across Europe and, when practiced correctly, is one of the most selective and least harmful fishing methods. EAA promotes knowledge, best practices and proportionate policies that protect fish welfare while recognising the broader pressures affecting fish populations and aquatic ecosystems.
Summary of the EAA position on animal welfare.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- Fish welfare matters at both individual and population level.
- Recreational angling is highly selective and among the least harmful fishing methods.
- Catch-and-release can be compatible with good welfare when best practices are applied.
- Proper handling and gear choice are essential to minimise stress and injury.
- Anglers are key conservation actors, supporting habitat protection and water quality.
- Other human pressures pose greater risks to fish welfare than recreational angling.
- Angling provides sustainable food and wellbeing benefits to society.
- Education and best-practice guidance are central to protecting fish welfare.
The European Anglers Alliance (EAA) fully supports strong measures to protect and restore weak Baltic salmon stocks and agrees with the scientific assessment that several river populations are at serious risk. At the same time, EAA underlines that recreational fishing is not the cause of weak salmon stocks. The main drivers of decline are low post-smolt survival, migration barriers, habitat degradation, altered marine ecosystems and increasing predation pressure, particularly from cormorants.
Recreational anglers and angling organisations are deeply engaged in salmon conservation, investing substantial time, resources and voluntary effort in river restoration, water quality monitoring and fisheries control. Maintaining angler involvement is essential to secure public support, continued investment in restoration measures and long-term recovery of salmon populations. EAA therefore calls for a balanced, ecosystem-based and adaptive management approach, combining effective protection of weak stocks with proportionate recreational fishing opportunities that sustain angler engagement and support broader environmental objectives, including river connectivity, habitat restoration and coordinated management of predation pressures.
As a result, the EAA suggests the following regulations and actions concerning Baltic salmon for 2025.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- A bag limit of one salmon (excluding recent spawners) per angler and day for sea anglers south of latitude 59.30 N.
- Recreational trolling north of 59.30 N should be subject to member state regulation and not be unnecessarily regulated by a 4 nautical mile boundary.
- Preliminary results of the ongoing study of mortality of Atlantic salmon released after being caught via trolling should be considered.
- Regulations demanding landing of whole un-filleted fish should only be for salmonids (salmon and sea trout), not for other species such as pike, perch and pikeperch.
- Utilise more EMFAF funding for the removal of fish migration barriers in the rivers.
- An ecosystem-based and adaptive management plan for salmon must be adopted.
- A Europe-wide program should be initiated to achieve a balanced European management of cormorants
Ahead of the European elections, the European Anglers Alliance (EAA), as part of the Living Rivers Europe coalition, supports a joint call for urgent action to address Europe’s climate and water crises. Living Rivers Europe brings together environmental NGOs including European Environmental Bureau, WWF, Wetlands International, The Nature Conservancy, and EAA.
Climate change is increasingly felt through water extremes—droughts, floods, heatwaves and water scarcity – exposing decades of river fragmentation, ecosystem degradation and unsustainable water use. A water-resilient Europe requires a fundamental shift in how water is valued and managed, prioritising river restoration and nature-based solutions over new grey infrastructure, with a stronger EU role in coordination, enforcement and climate adaptation.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
Joint position paper for a water resilient Europe
Our asks – at a glance:
- Full implementation of the EU Green Deal >> Deliver a resilient Europe by mitigating climate change, halting biodiversity loss and reducing resource use, including water. This includes the urgent adoption and ambitious implementation of the EU Nature Restoration Law, with National Restoration Plans used to strengthen nature-based climate adaptation.
- A new Water and Climate Resilience Law >> Establish legally binding requirements for EU Natural Water Reserves to protect critical water resources and catchments in water-stressed areas, supported by adequate EU funding. This should include an EU Sponge Facility, restoration of floodplains, rivers and wetlands, and basin-level water efficiency and abstraction targets covering all sectors.
- Full enforcement of the Water Framework Directive >> Strengthen implementation by increasing the European Commission’s legal and enforcement capacity,
- Climate adaptation proofing of EU policies >> Subject all new EU legislative and non-legislative acts to independent scientific screening by a dedicated Climate Adaptation Panel, ensuring climate resilience is embedded across water- and land-use policies.
- End harmful EU subsidies >> Phase out EU funding for activities that damage river morphology, water quality, natural water retention, soils and groundwater, and redirect investment towards restoration and resilience.
Positions & Resolutions 2023
Fisheries management in the EU is still largely driven by maximum sustainable yield (MSY) and catch limits. This narrow focus has contributed to truncated age structures, the loss of large, highly productive fish, and reduced stock resilience. Scientific evidence increasingly shows that healthy age and size structures are essential for long-term stock productivity, stability and ecosystem health.
Building on scientific advances and discussions held at the European Parliament during the RecFishing Forum, the European Anglers Alliance (EAA) calls for fisheries management to move beyond MSY alone and to integrate age- and size-based indicators, as already required under EU environmental legislation. Selective recreational angling provides practical tools to support such modern, ecosystem-based management approaches.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
EAA asks – at a glance:
- Manage for healthy age and size structures >> Aim for fish populations with natural age and size distributions, in line with the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and Good Environmental Status objectives.
- Use MSY as a limit, not a target >> Apply MSY as an upper boundary, complemented by indicators that protect large, old and highly productive fish.
- Combine management measures >> Move beyond catch limits alone by using harvest slots, spatial and temporal closures, and adaptive tools tailored to stock needs.
- Align EU fisheries legislation >> Fully integrate the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy, the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and related EU laws into stock management.
- Recognise the role of recreational angling >> Acknowledge angling’s low environmental impact, high selectivity, and significant social and economic value, including its potential to support innovative management solutions.
The European Anglers Alliance (EAA) is deeply concerned about the growing impact of cormorant predation on fish biodiversity in European rivers, lakes and coastal waters. Anglers respect cormorants as a natural part of Europe’s ecosystems. However, following the implementation of the Birds Directive, cormorant populations have reached a favourable conservation status and are no longer threatened.
Current management tools, including Article 9 derogations, have proven insufficient to protect vulnerable fish populations. Scientific evidence, including tagging studies, shows that cormorant predation can rapidly and severely affect fish stocks, particularly where breeding and feeding areas are geographically disconnected. Habitat restoration alone has been shown to be insufficient to address this pressure. Where fish populations and biodiversity are at risk, their protection must be prioritised, while maintaining a favourable conservation status for cormorants.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
European Anglers call for:
- An EU-level adaptive population management model for the great cormorant to reduce excessive predation pressure and safeguard fish stocks and biodiversity.
- The protection and restoration of healthy aquatic ecosystems across Europe, ensuring balanced coexistence between fish populations and cormorants.
- The maintenance of a favourable conservation status for cormorants, while preventing disproportionate impacts on vulnerable fish populations.
The European Anglers Alliance (EAA) considers the European eel (Anguilla anguilla) to be at serious risk of extinction. Scientific advice clearly shows that eel recovery is being undermined primarily by non-fisheries impacts, including migration barriers, hydropower mortality, habitat degradation, pollution and illegal trade. While fisheries management plays a role, it cannot deliver recovery on its own without decisive action on these wider pressures.
EAA acknowledges differing views within the angling community, including concerns that poorly designed blanket bans may have unintended consequences. However, EAA stresses that the current situation requires precautionary, ecosystem-based action, with priority given to restoring habitats, ensuring free migration and reducing all human-induced mortality affecting the eel throughout its life cycle.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
The EAA calls for:
- All anthropogenic impacts (e.g., caused by hydropower, pumping stations, pollution etc.) that decrease the production and escapement of silver eels should be reduced to – or kept as close to – zero as possible. Eels must be prioritised, and the eel’s natural habitat range must once again be made accessible via river restoration and installation of mitigation techniques.
- Stop all targeted fishing for eels, commercial as well as recreational, at all its life stages, and compulsory release of all eel by-catches.
- Fishing for eels and elvers should only be allowed for research purposes (e.g., tagging and monitoring).
- EAA does not accept that profiteering by private hydropower companies should be put ahead of species conservation. EAA therefore calls for the regulation and sanction of the operation of hydropower plants rather than abandon natural eel habitats.
- Stop all sale of eels.
- Increased efforts with enforcement to restrict illegal fishing and the sale of eel in all its life stages.
- Increase research to find the specific area in the Sargasso Sea that European eels breed, for that area to be protected.
The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) confirms that western Baltic cod remains highly vulnerable, affected by poor environmental conditions, reduced reproduction and past overfishing, while selective commercial gears to reduce bycatch are still insufficiently applied. Management therefore requires continued caution.
The European Anglers Alliance (EAA) underlines that recreational fishing is fundamentally different from commercial fishing. Anglers do not fish for profit and are primarily motivated by the fishing experience rather than catch volumes. Long-standing bag limits show that recreational anglers have already contributed to stock protection.
Recreational angling also delivers significant socio-economic benefits to coastal regions, particularly through tourism. EAA stresses that anglers, as users and stewards of the resource, remain committed to supporting the long-term recovery of western Baltic cod.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
EAA demands for 2024 – Baltic Cod
- Recreational fishing opportunities for cod must be preserved.
- Consider a combination of management measures that ensures equivalent protection at simultaneous higher anglers’ satisfaction: introduce a maximum landing size for anglers, increase the minimum landing size and combine both with seasonal closures and bag limits1; intensify the dialogue between the interest groups, science, and politics.
- No dedicated fishing activities on spawning cod.
- Improvement and obligatory use of selective gear to reduce bycatch of cod in commercial fisheries is urgently needed.
- Investigate and consider the impact of cormorant predation on cod stocks.
The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) has confirmed that several Baltic salmon river stocks remain weak and at risk, particularly in Assessment Unit 5, and has recommended strong measures to prevent further decline, including closures of mixed-stock sea fisheries. ICES recognises that limited fishing opportunities may be possible under strict spatial and temporal management, provided weak stocks are effectively protected.
The European Anglers Alliance (EAA) agrees with the scientific assessment of stock status and the need for robust salmon management, but stresses that recreational angling is not the cause of weak river stocks. The main drivers of decline lie in river fragmentation, habitat degradation, predation pressure and reduced survival during migration. Recreational anglers are deeply engaged in salmon conservation and river restoration, and their continued involvement is essential to secure public support, long-term investment and the recovery of Baltic salmon populations.
The EAA suggests the following regulations and actions concerning Baltic Salmon for 2024.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- A bag limit of one salmon (wild or fin-clipped) per angler and day for sea anglers south of latitude 59.30 N.
- Recreational trolling north of 59.30 N should be subject to member state regulation and not be unnecessarily regulated by a 4 nautical mile boundary.
- A new study of mortality of Atlantic salmon released after being caught via trolling should be carried out.
- Regulations demanding landing of whole un-filleted fish should only be for salmonids (salmon and sea trout), not for other species such as pike, perch and pikeperch.
- Utilise more EMFAF funding for the removal of fish migration barriers in the rivers.
- A Europe-wide program should be initiated to achieve a balanced European management of cormorants.
Positions & Resolutions 2022
The European Anglers Alliance (EAA) supports the urgent acceleration of renewable energy deployment under the EU’s REPowerEU agenda to strengthen energy security and reduce dependence on fossil fuels. However, EAA strongly cautions against treating hydropower as a priority solution within this framework. Further expansion or refurbishment of hydropower risks undermining EU water, biodiversity and nature restoration objectives, while delivering limited and increasingly unreliable energy benefits under climate change conditions.
Hydropower is already one of the main drivers of river fragmentation and biodiversity loss in Europe. A renewed hydropower push would contradict the Water Framework Directive, the Birds and Habitats Directives, and the EU’s commitment to restoring free-flowing rivers. Climate-neutral energy pathways increasingly show that Europe can meet its targets without further hydropower expansion, while avoiding irreversible damage to freshwater ecosystems.
Find the key points of the EAA position
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- Exclude new or revamped hydropower projects from the ‘go-to areas’ and streamlined permitting under the amended Renewable Energy Directive
- Ensure that ‘go-to areas’ for other technologies exclude migratory corridors for freshwater and diadromous fish and, unless the renewable energy technology to be deployed is compatible with the planned nature protection and restoration, areas foreseen for nature restoration under the proposed Nature Restoration Law including free-flowing rivers;
- Delete the general presumption of overriding public interest for all renewable energy projects, as, in the case of hydropower, this goes against the existing case law on the provisions of the Water Framework Directive and the Birds and Habitats Directives.
- As a consequence, any amendments to the Recovery and Resilience Facility Regulation to integrate dedicated REPowerEU chapters in Member States’ existing recovery and resilience plans (RRPs) should not prioritise any further investments in new or in revamped hydropower projects.
The European Anglers Alliance (EAA) is part of the Living Rivers Europe (LRE) coalition, together with leading European environmental organisations. Through this coalition, EAA advocates for ambitious, legally binding river restoration targets that address the severe degradation of Europe’s freshwater ecosystems.
Freshwater habitats are among the most damaged ecosystems in Europe, with widespread river fragmentation and declining biodiversity undermining water quality, climate resilience and fish populations. The proposed EU Nature Restoration Law represents a critical opportunity to reverse these trends by restoring river connectivity and scaling up barrier removal. However, given the scale and urgency of freshwater degradation, stronger targets, clearer priorities and adequate funding are needed to ensure meaningful and timely restoration outcomes.
This is a joint statement by the Living Rivers Europe (LRE) coalition, bringing together the European Anglers Alliance (EAA), the European Environmental Bureau, the European Rivers Network, The Nature Conservancy, Wetlands International and WWF.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
Summary
Together, we urge the European Parliament and the Council, acting as co-legislators on the EU Nature Restoration Law, to:
- Raise the barrier removal target to 15% of EU river length (178,000 km) restored to a free-flowing state by 2030 and make it legally binding;
- Remove the highlight given to exemptions to the Water Framework Directive and TEN-T regulation to ensure proper implementation.
- Ask Member States to prioritise barrier removals according to the ecological potential of the removal, in particular the connectivity between marine and freshwater ecosystems.
- Ask Member States to include in their national restoration plans a description of the simplification of procedures and skill-building measures necessary to enable river restoration projects to be carried out efficiently and with the necessary public engagement.
- Increase the intermediary percentage targets laid out in Article 4 for the restoration and re-establishment of areas and the restoration of habitats of species, and shorten the timeline for reaching 100%, as this article also covers some freshwater ecosystems and those restoration actions would also complement the action on river connectivity.
- Call on the European institutions to expand the EU financing support available for free-flowing river restoration in addition to the sources identified in the EU Guidance on barrier removal for river restoration, for example, through the establishment of dedicated funding for nature restoration, pursuant to the mid-term review of the Multiannual Financial Framework.
The European Anglers Alliance (EAA) believes it is high time to fully include Marine Recreational Fisheries (MRF) in the Common Fisheries Policy. Recreational fisheries generate high social and economic value, support coastal and rural communities, and generally have a lower environmental impact than many other fishing activities, yet they remain underrepresented in CFP decision-making.
Healthy fish stocks are our capital, and the CFP is the framework managing that shared public resource. To deliver a resilient, growth-oriented and sustainable blue economy, recreational anglers must have a seat at the table. Better integration of MRF into the CFP will lead to better data, better policy, better business and better lives.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
EAA position – at a glance
- Fully integrate Marine Recreational Fisheries into the CFP >> Recognise MRF as an integral part of EU fisheries management, alongside commercial fisheries and aquaculture.
- Implement Article 17 effectively >> Apply transparent, objective and science-based allocation criteria that reward fisheries with high socio-economic value and low environmental impact.
- Ensure fair representation of recreational anglers >> Involve anglers in management decisions to strengthen legitimacy, compliance and acceptance.
- Develop management objectives suited to MRF >> Introduce angler-specific and ecosystem-based objectives, including growth-oriented approaches where appropriate.
- Improve data and scientific frameworks >> Invest in robust data collection and assessment tools for recreational fisheries.
- Support coastal economies and jobs >> Use CFP implementation to unlock the full potential of recreational fisheries for sustainable local development.
The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) has confirmed that western Baltic cod remains under pressure from poor environmental conditions, reduced reproductive success and the legacy of overfishing, while selective commercial gears to reduce bycatch are still insufficiently applied. Although ICES advice for 2023 allows for increased catches under the EU management plan, the stock remains fragile and highly dependent on cautious, well-designed management.
The European Anglers Alliance (EAA) stresses that recreational fishing differs fundamentally from commercial fishing. Anglers do not fish for profit and are motivated by the experience rather than catch volumes. Long-standing measures such as strict bag limits demonstrate that recreational anglers have already made a meaningful contribution to stock protection, while continuing to deliver significant socio-economic benefits to coastal communities. EAA therefore calls for management approaches that protect cod recovery while preserving proportionate recreational fishing opportunities.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
EAA demands at a glance – Western Baltic cod (2023)
- Recreational fishing opportunities for cod must be preserved.
- Consider alternative management measures which further strengthen stocks: e.g., increased minimum landing size; introduce a maximum landing size – to protect the biggest cod, the ‘super spawners; targeted management of recreational fishing; intensification of the trialogue between the interest groups, science, and politics.
- No dedicated fishing activities on spawning cod.
- Improvement and obligatory use of selective gear to reduce bycatch of cod in commercial fisheries, is urgently needed.
- Investigate and consider the impact of cormorant predation on cod stocks (3, 4, 5).
Positions & Resolutions 2021
Scientific advice from ICES for Western Baltic cod in 2022 confirms continued poor reproductive success, compounded by environmental constraints and historical over-mortality. While recreational anglers have already accepted significant restrictions, further management must be proportionate to actual sectoral impact and support long-term recovery. Recreational fishing contributes substantial socio-economic value to coastal regions and is driven by experience rather than commercial catch. In this context, EAA calls for balanced, science-based measures that maintain opportunities for recreational cod fishing while prioritising stock rebuilding.
With regards to Western Baltic Cod, these are the EAA demands for 2022.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- The possibility of recreational fishing for cod must be preserved.
- Consider alternative management measures which further lower the recreational catch: e.g., increased minimum landing size; introduce a maximum landing size – to protect the biggest cod, the ‘super spawners; targeted management of recreational fishing; intensification of the trialogue between the interest groups, science and politics.
- No dedicated fishing activities on spawning cod.
- Improvement and obligatory use of selective gear to reduce bycatch of cod in commercial fisheries, is urgently needed.
EAA Climate Change Position Paper, September 2021
The following positions summarise the European Anglers Alliance’s EAA Climate Change Position Paper (September 2021).
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- EAA recognises that human-induced carbon emissions are driving climate change, significantly altering marine and freshwater environments and threatening fish stocks and recreational fisheries. EAA calls for ambitious EU and Member State climate action to reduce emissions in line with scientific recommendations.
- Shifts in species distribution due to climate change pose both risks and opportunities for recreational fisheries. EAA supports adaptive, flexible management that allows anglers to respond to changing fish availability while protecting vulnerable stocks.
- Marine and freshwater ecosystems are increasingly impacted by cumulative pressures including habitat loss, pollution, barriers to fish migration, overfishing and acidification. EAA urges the EU to prioritise tackling these pressures as part of effective climate mitigation and adaptation strategies.
- EAA members are actively engaged in projects that enhance ecosystem resilience and address climate impacts locally. The value of this work should be formally recognised and supported through dedicated EU funding mechanisms.
- Adaptation to evolving stock distributions is essential for the future of recreational angling. EAA encourages regulators and fisheries managers to adopt proactive, precautionary approaches that support sustainable recreational fishing in a changing climate.
- As species shift their ranges, EU policy must help recreational fisheries seize new opportunities while securing socio-economic benefits for coastal and rural communities. This includes support for training, gear adaptation and diversification where appropriate.
- Increased frequency of extreme weather may reduce safe angling seasons. EAA calls for improved access infrastructure and further research on the impacts of climate-related weather events on fisheries participation and dependent communities.
- Recreational fishing remains under-recognised in the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). EAA calls for its full and fair inclusion in CFP decision-making, ensuring that climate impacts and the socio-economic value of recreational fisheries are properly reflected.
- Future climate change assessments of fish stocks and fisheries should explicitly include recreational catch data and consider ecological, social and economic effects on recreational fisheries. Enhanced data collection will improve management outcomes for all sectors. 
- Understanding how climate change affects fish availability, catchability and angler behaviour is critical for effective management. EAA calls for EU-funded research into species shifts, habitat protection and adaptation strategies for recreational anglers.
The European Anglers Alliance (EAA), together with the European Fishing Tackle Trade Association (EFTTA), has long advocated for sustainable management of European sea bass, a key species for millions of sea anglers and the coastal economies they support. Emergency measures to protect the stock were introduced in 2015 after years of declining abundance, including recreational bag limits and closed seasons – often more restrictive for anglers than for commercial fishers. EAA and EFTTA members have been patient and cooperative, but current measures continue to disproportionately impact recreational fishing and management data remain uncertain.
In this context, we propose the following adjustments to bag limits, closed seasons and Minimum Conservation Reference Size (MCRS) to ensure fair and effective sea bass management.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- A small change in the bag-limit from the present 2 in 9 months to 3 in 8 months (both for northern and southern bass). A change to three fish for eight months, would be very similar to two fish for nine months, and within the ICES advice according the Commissions very own tool (which they have said they insist on using). In effect the 3/8 impact is just under (2 tonnes) the 2/9 impact.
- One-and-the-same closed season for recreational fisheries in both southern and northern waters
- One-and-the-same closed season for commercial fisheries in both southern and northern waters
- A harmonised MCRS 42cm for all EU waters
EAA calls for closed-containment salmon farming now
Wild Atlantic salmon are in rapid decline across Europe, largely due to the proven impacts of open-net salmon farming. Despite decades of mitigation efforts, populations continue to fall. The European Anglers Alliance (EAA) therefore calls for decisive political action to protect this shared European natural heritage and ensure the long-term coexistence of aquaculture and wild fish.
Find the following summary of the EAA Position on aquaculture.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- Strengthen EU and national legislation governing salmon aquaculture to better protect wild Atlantic salmon.
- From 2022 onwards, allow new salmon farms or expansions only if closed-containment systems are used.
- Make closed-containment farming mandatory for all existing salmon farms by 2030.
- Eliminate the two main threats from aquaculture—salmon lice and escapes of farmed fish—by fully separating farming operations from the natural environment.
- Prevent genetic damage to wild salmon stocks caused by interbreeding with escaped farmed salmon.
- Reduce salmon-lice-induced mortality of wild salmon migrating along European and Nordic coastlines.
- Improve the ecological status of salmon rivers in line with the Water Framework Directive and Habitats Directive.
- Ensure that economic interests of salmon farming do not override the survival of wild salmon and their ecosystems.
- Apply the same regulatory determination once used to curb industrial pollution on land to marine aquaculture.
- Act immediately to halt the long-term decline of wild Atlantic salmon and secure their future in European rivers, fjords and seas.
Positions & Resolutions 2020
Europe’s rivers are among the most altered ecosystems on Earth, and most are not in good ecological condition. Hydropower – especially small-scale installations – places disproportionate pressure on rivers, reducing their resilience and ability to sustain wildlife.
See following summary of EAA Position Paper on (small-scale) hydropower installations.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- No new hydropower plants should be installed in European rivers; impacts on aquatic ecosystems, flora and fauna are severe—especially unacceptable in protected areas.
- Reduce the number of plants and dams and implement robust mitigation (effective fish protection and fully functional fish passes) to halt biodiversity loss.
- Fewer hydropower installations are essential for Member States to comply with the Water Framework Directive, Birds and Habitats Directives, and the 2027 ecological status deadline.
- Calling hydropower “green energy” is misleading: while renewable, its ecological damage can exceed climate impacts and weakens climate resilience of rivers
- Small hydropower delivers negligible energy but causes major damage: ~91% of EU plants (<10 MW) produce ~2.1% of renewable electricity (<0.4% of total EU energy); adding thousands more yields minimal gains with devastating impacts.
- Best sites are already used: new projects have lower energy return on investment and higher environmental costs.
- Small plants are less efficient and more damaging per unit of energy than larger installations.
- Cumulative impacts grow exponentially, especially where rivers already host hydropower—or even in pristine systems.
- Protect remaining free-flowing rivers as hydropower “no-go” zones; restore at least 25,000 km of EU rivers to free-flowing condition by 2030.
- Perpetual permits are unacceptable; time-limited permits are needed to enable removal where installations are no longer needed or wanted.
In 2008, the European Parliament urged the European Commission to promote coordinated, sustainable management of cormorant populations and to create conditions for a Europe-wide management plan. This request was not acted upon and remains fully relevant today. Europe’s cormorant population is still estimated at around two million birds, with significant impacts on threatened and protected fish species and on fishing quality in inland and coastal waters.
While the Commission maintains that coordinated use of derogations under the Birds Directive is sufficient, the ongoing scale of damage demonstrates that current approaches are inadequate.
Against this background, find the following summary of the key point and EAA position. This position underlines the need to move from fragmented national responses towards coordinated, science-based management of cormorants in Europe.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- Effective use of Article 9 derogations >> Member States should make full and coordinated use of Article 9 of the Birds Directive to protect fisheries, fish stocks, and aquatic ecosystems from cormorant damage.
- Introduction of regional management plans >> Where pan-European consensus is lacking, regional cooperation is a pragmatic first step.
- Nordic–Baltic cooperation as a pilot model >> The Nordic–Baltic region hosts over 50% of Europe’s breeding cormorants, whose impacts extend far beyond the region during migration and wintering.
- Build on existing scientific capacity >> Countries such as Denmark, Sweden and Finland already conduct regular population counts and have strong knowledge of migration patterns—essential foundations for science-based management.
- Address lack of coordination >> Although Baltic Sea states manage cormorants to varying degrees, actions remain largely uncoordinated and therefore less effective.
- Flexible participation >> Not all Baltic states need to participate from the outset; the scheme should remain open to interested countries such as Norway or the UK.
- Substantial but phased population reduction >> A controlled reduction of cormorant numbers is needed to alleviate widespread ecological and fisheries impacts.
- Apply adaptive management >> Adaptive management allows annual adjustment while safeguarding the species’ favourable conservation status.
- Reduce long-term costs and conflicts >> Lower population levels would reduce recurring damage, management efforts and associated costs across Europe.
- Balance conservation with socio-economic needs >> In line with Articles 1 and 2 of the Birds Directive, bird protection must also consider ecological balance, economic interests and recreational fishing.
EAA & EFTTA position on recreational fisheries provisions
The EU is revising its Fisheries Control System, with implications for both commercial and recreational fisheries. Following the 2024 European elections, the European Parliament has decided to restart work on the file from scratch, with Clara Aguilera appointed as rapporteur. While many elements of the European Commission proposal are welcomed, the European Anglers Alliance (EAA) and the European Fishing Tackle Trade Association (EFTTA) focus here on the provisions affecting recreational fisheries and call for fair, proportionate and workable rules.
Against this background, find the following summary of the key points of the EAA & EFTTA position. Overall, EAA and EFTTA call for proportionate, workable and evidence-based rules that improve data and compliance without discouraging participation or harming the socio-economic value of recreational fisheries across Europe.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- Fairness between sectors >> Recreational fisheries must not be subject to stricter or more burdensome controls than small-scale commercial fisheries.
- Registration or licensing of recreational fishers (Art. 55) >> EAA & EFTTA support compulsory registration or licensing to improve data quality, while strongly defending Member States’ freedom to choose the system.
- No mandatory fees by default >> Where new systems are introduced, they should be free of charge unless fees are clearly earmarked for recreational fisheries projects and agreed with the sector.
- Targeted catch reporting >> Mandatory reporting should be limited to stocks subject to EU conservation measures, with electronic reporting prioritised but non-digital options retained.
- Gear marking – yes, but proportionate >> Marking of recreational nets and traps is supported; rod-and-line angling gear must be exempt.
- Opposition to recreational vessel registers >> Registering recreational vessels based on possible target species is unnecessary, impractical and adds no management value.
- Tracking of recreational vessels – reject as a rule >> Vessel tracking is opposed, except possibly for recreational vessels authorised to fish inside Marine Protected Areas, where specific justification exists.
- Serious infringements need a rewrite >> Applying commercial fisheries infringement rules to recreational fishing is inappropriate; penalties should be progressive and focus on repeat offences.
- Member State responsibility for fines >> Member States should set fines, with EU intervention only if enforcement is ineffective or non-deterrent.
- Charter boats need a clear definition >> Skippered charter boats should be clearly defined and recognised as a distinct segment; vessel rules may mirror small-scale commercial fisheries, but catches must remain attributed to individual anglers—not the vessel.
Sea bass fishing opportunities for 2020 will be decided by the Council of Ministers in December. EAA and EFTTA present a science-based and proportionate approach for recreational sea bass angling that ensures stock sustainability while avoiding unnecessary socio-economic damage.
Find the following summary of the key points of the EAA & EFTTA position on Sea Bass fishing opportunities for 2020.
The full position paper, including notes and references, can be downloaded below.
- Set a recreational bag limit of 3 sea bass per angler per day for the open season (1 April–1 November).
- Apply ICES advice conservatively, agreeing the lowest total removals (1,634 tonnes).
- Ensure non-discriminatory rules between recreational and commercial fisheries.
- Ensure non-discriminatory rules between recreational and commercial fisheries.
- Protect the economic and social value of recreational sea bass fishing while ensuring stock sustainability.